Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 So. 2d 1371 - Holsemback v. State

443 So. 2d 1371 - Holsemback v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
4
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably State v. LaMar (2002), State v. Keene (1998)

64 state decisions

3001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Harrington v. California · Schneble v. Florida · Patton v. United States · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The trial of multiple defendants carries "substantial risks of manifest unfairness.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The test of whether a severance should be granted on the ground of prejudice to the defendants is whether under all the circumstances as a practical matter it is within the capacity of the jurors to follow the court's instructions and to collate and appraise the independent evidence against each defendant solely upon that defendant's own acts.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"The supreme court shall make and promulgate rules governing the administration of all courts and rules governing practice and procedure in all courts; provided, however, that such rules shall not abridge, enlarge or modify the substantive right of any party nor affect the jurisdiction of circuit and district courts or venue of actions therein; and provided, further, that the right of trial by jury as at common law and declared by section 11 of the Constitution of Alabama 1901 shall be preserved to the parties inviolate. These rules may be changed by a general act of statewide application."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.