443 So. 2d 613 - State v. Hebert’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2011
1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · 414 So. 2d 1229 - State v. Feeback · 415 So. 2d 182 - State v. Tribbet · 346 So. 2d 181 - State v. Williams · 419 So. 2d 436 - State v. Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Conway · State v. Runyon““ ... LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841 precludes consideration of an objection upon appeal when the basis for that objection was not first brought to the trial judge’s attention in order to allow him to cure the alleged defect. State v. Feeback, 414 So.2d 1229 (La.1982).” 443 So.2d at 618 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.