443 So. 2d 962 - Bottoson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Bottoson v. Florida (1984), Bottoson v. Moore (2002)
1 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · Rideout v. United States · United States v. Henry · United States v. Robertson · Demps v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with appellant that it is error for the jury to be exposed to materials that have not been properly introduced into evidence. However, before a mistrial can be granted, it must be shown that the existence of an unauthorized object in the jury room has somehow prejudiced the defendant. There is no prejudice where the information conveyed by the unauthorized materials merely duplicates evidence that had been properly presented to the jury at the trial. In this case the unadmitted exhibit that was inadvertently allowed to go into the jury room merely reproduced the testimony of the FBI agent, which the jury had already heard. We therefore hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“whether the accused exhibited an actual subjective expectation to negotiate a plea at the time of the discussion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. State“[A]ppellant had previously been convicted of a crime involving the threat of violence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bottoson v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.