Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 SW3D 170 - Black v. Shor

Black v. Shor’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Kalb v. Feuerstein · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller · Verburgt v. Dorner · Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the entity that is to receive aid must be a judgment creditor; (2) the court that would grant aid must be one of appropriate jurisdiction; (3) the aid to be given must be in order to reach property to obtain satisfaction on the judgment; and (4) the judgment debtor must own property (including present or future rights to property) that: (a) cannot be readily attached or levied on by ordinary legal process and (b) is not exempt from attachment, execution, or seizure for the satisfaction of liabilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he court may render a number of amended turnover orders, all of which could be final, appealable judgments if they satisfy Schultz's test by acting as mandatory injunctions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] turnover order is a final, appealable judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.