Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 443 U.S. 1 - MacKey v. Montrym

MacKey v. Montrym’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

1,405
cited by 1,405 later decisions
29
cited 29 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

199 federal appellate · 67 district · 846 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,405 later decisions (29 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc. (1981), South Dakota v. Neville (1983)

199 federal appellate · 67 district · 846 state decisions — followed in 46 states

5280197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Aguilar v. Texas · Stanley v. Illinois · Fuentes v. Shevin

Cited together with Mathews v. Eldridge · Dixon v. Love · Bell v. Burson · Goldberg v. Kelly · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,405 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.”
    40 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Due Process Clause has never been construed to require that the procedures used to guard against an erroneous deprivation of a protectible 'property' or 'liberty' interest be so comprehensive as to preclude any possibility of error.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he specific dictates of due process must be shaped by 'the risk of error inherent in the truth finding process as applied to the generality of cases' rather than the rare exceptions.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.