Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 A2D 345 - Erickson v. State

Erickson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

4 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2021

4 district · 19 state decisions

9019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wescott v. Allstate Insurance · Dunton v. Eastern Fine Paper Company · Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. County of Riverside · Davies v. City of Bath · Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Notice requirements for filing. Within 180 days after a cause of action against a governmental entity accrues, or at a later time within the limits of section 8110, when a claimant shows good cause why notice could not have reasonably been filed within the 180-day limit, a claimant or his personal representative shall file a written notice containing: A. The name and address of the claimant, and the name and address of his attorney or other representative, if any; B. A concise statement of the basis of the claim, including the date, time, place and circumstances of the act, omission or occurrence complained of; C. The name and address of any governmental employee involved, if known; D. A concise statement of the nature and extent of the injury claimed to have been suffered; and E.A statement of the amount of monetary damages claimed.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[t]he general purposes of a notice requirement are to save needless expense and litigation by providing an opportunity for amicable resolution of disputes, and to allow the defendant to fully investigate claims and defenses.” Id. at 349-50 (citing cases). Plaintiffs ‘’Complaint”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.