Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 A.2d 387 - Canning v. State

Canning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dufault v. Midland-Ross of Canada, Ltd. · Conners' Case · Canning v. State Department of Transportation · Comer's Case · Levesque v. Levesque

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the commission like any adjudicative body has a legitimate interest in bringing litigation before it to an eventual end, and liberal though the standard of pleading must be, the commission may properly dismiss a case if the pleadings themselves, after ample opportunity to amend, still show as a matter of law that there is no cognizable issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.