Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 A.2d 404 - State v. Ledger

State v. Ledger’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Dechaine (1990), State v. Reilly (1982)

37 state decisions

19019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant may be mentally competent to stand trial although in some other respects his mind is unsound.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “tends to create a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he trial court committed no abuse of discretion by overruling the defendant’s objection to this testimony on the ground that it created a danger that the jury would rely too heavily on it. The significance of these complaints and threats in proving motive and intent, and the defendant’s opportunity to cross-examine the witness to expose any mitigating circumstances in which they were made, renders the court’s ruling a proper one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.