Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 A.2d 45 - State v. Carmichael

State v. Carmichael’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2008

9 state decisions

70198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Philbrick · State v. Myers · State v. Terrio · State v. St. Clair · State v. Ruybal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A variance between allegation and proof at trial will justify the entry of a judgment of acquittal only when the State, as a result, fails to prove the crime alleged.... With respect to the date of the offense ‘[t]he settled rule of law is that ... proof of the commission of the offense on any day within the statute of limitations, regardless of the date alleged in the indictment is not a material variance unless it prejudices the defendant.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.