Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 F.2d 1093

Docket No. 25883.

Serrano v. Hocker

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-08-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1972

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Harrington v. California · Stork v. United States · United States v. Reid

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

David W. Hagen (argued), of Goldwater, Taber, Hill & Mortimer, F. DeArmond Sharp (argued), of Hawkins, Rhodes & Hawkins, Reno, Nev., for plaintiff-appellant.

Herbert F. Ahlswede, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Harvey Dickerson, Nevada Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior district judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In this collateral attack on a state murder conviction, we find that the test of Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284, fits the point on the introduction into evidence of an illegally seized gun. We find the error was harmless.

¶2

The other alleged errors in the state trial do not rise to constitutional proportions.

/444/f2d/1093 · .json · Public domain