United States v. Easterly’s Empirical Analysis
444 F.2d 1236 · 1971
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 1991 · most notably United States v. Gray (1980), United States v. Baytank (Houston), Inc. (1991)
39 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 472
Relies on Holmgren v. United States · Locke v. The United States · In re Disbarment of Chopak · United States v. Joe M. Mendoza · United States v. Noble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We cannot put the district court in error for refusing to give an instruction when none was requested and no apparent prejudice resulted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.