Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 F.2d 310 - United States v. George

United States v. George’s Empirical Analysis

444 F.2d 310 · 1971

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2013 · most notably Gelbard v. United States (1972), United States v. Mandujano (1976)

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

26019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 2514 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 28 U.S.C. § 1826

Relies on Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Lutwak v. United States · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Blair v. United States · Hawkins v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]o long as it is not the sole or dominant purpose of the grand jury to discover facts relating to [a defendant's] pending indictment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “No such witness shall be prosecuted or subjected to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter or thing concerning which he is compelled . . . to testify or produce evidence, nor shall testimony so compelled be used as evidence in any criminal proceeding . . . against him in any court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did not relate to his wife nor to any communication with her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.