Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 F.2d 542

Docket No. 71-1506.

Moore v. Wainwright

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-07-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1971

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America · Kimbrough v. Beto

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-07-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1444 F.2d 542

¶2Arthur Lee MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent-Appellee.

¶3No. 71-1506.

¶4United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

¶5July 8, 1971.

¶6Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; William A. McRae, Jr., Judge.

¶7Arthur Lee Moore, pro se.

¶8Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. State of Florida, William W. Herring, Joseph W. DeMember, Asst. Attys. Gens., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

¶9Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

¶10PER CURIAM:

¶11Affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.2

¶12Notes:

1

¶13 It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981

2

¶14 See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

/444/f2d/542 · .json · Public domain