Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 F.2d 546

Docket No. 71-1808.

In re Bowden

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1971.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-06-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1971

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1826

Relies on Michael Gorean Stewart v. United States of America, Charles Joseph Kastigar v. United States · Charleston v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-06-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Frederick O. Frederickson (argued), of Graham, McCord, Dunn, Moen, Johnston & Rosenquist, Seattle, Wash., for appellant.

¶2James E. Figenshaw (argued), Barbara J. Svedberg, Attys., Dept, of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before KOELSCH, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5The order of the district court adjudging Charles E. Bowden guilty of civil contempt and directing his confinement, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826, is affirmed. Stewart v. United States, 440 F.2d 954 (9th Cir. 1971); Charleston v. United States, 444 F.2d 504 (9th Cir. 1971).

¶6A petition for rehearing will not be entertained. Issuance of a mandate is stayed for thirty days to enable appellant to apply for a writ of certiorari. If timely application for such writ is filed, the stay shall remain in effect until the application is denied or, if granted, pending determination of the cause by the Supreme Court.

/444/f2d/546 · .json · Public domain