Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 F.2d 61 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

444 F.2d 61 · 1971

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
7
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2006 · most notably United States v. Kirk (1976), United States v. Zylstra (1983)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

1501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984)

Relies on Stack v. Boyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(W)e think the course of the common law in England and the development of the common law and statutory law in the United States demonstrate that the courts have the inherent power to place restrictive conditions upon the granting of bail.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The primary purpose of bail is to allow an accused person not yet tried to be free of restraint while at the same time insuring that person's presence at the pending court proceedings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “While bail is favored and is granted in the ordinary course of events, an accused by his actions can forfeit the right to bail and the court is under a duty to protect prospective witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.