Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 F.2d 640 - American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Association, Not Individually, but as Trustee Under Trust No. Ti-24356 v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, World Auxiliary Insurance Co., Ltd., Sued as Lloyd's of London, American Home Assurance Company, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Sued as Fireman's Fund, American Insurance Company, North American Life & Casualty Company and Old Republic Insurance Company, Defendants-Cross-Appellants v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Association, Not Individually, but as Trustee Under Trust No. Ti-24356, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee

American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Association, Not Individually, but as Trustee Under Trust No. Ti-24356 v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, World Auxiliary Insurance Co., Ltd., Sued as Lloyd's of London, American Home Assurance Company, Associated Indemnity Corporation, Sued as Fireman's Fund, American Insurance Company, North American Life & Casualty Company and Old Republic Insurance Company, Defendants-Cross-Appellants v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking Association, Not Individually, but as Trustee Under Trust No. Ti-24356, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee’s Empirical Analysis

444 F.2d 640 · 1971

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2017

11 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

11019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 15 Ill. 2d 308 - Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · 33 Ill. 2d 566 - Mooney v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London · 289 Ill. App. 520 - Sommerio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · 4 Ill. App. 2d 60 - La Penta v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) giving retroactive as well as prospective effect to rejection, thus treating the application, notwithstanding the ‘binder’ as no more than an offer by the applicant; (2) giving no retroactive effect to a rejection, thus treating the binder as a contract of insurance during the interim; (3) giving effect to the rejection only where, on as objective a basis as possible, it is reasonable to say that the rejection is based on the circumstances which existed at the time of the application.” (American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (7th Cir. 1971), 444 F.2d 640 , 643.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Actual intent to deceive need not be established if the misrepresentation materially affected the acceptance of risk....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'unless they are of such a nature that all persons would agree that they are or are not material.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.