Randall E. Sebold, Sr. v. Irene H. Sebold’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Ramsey v. Ramsey (1975), Overton v. City of Austin (1984)
9 federal appellate · 5 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Durfee v. Duke · Sarah Fall v. Elizabeth Eastin · Lopez v. Lopez · Stelz v. . Shreck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That equal shares are here required, however, does not mean that they are always required. Special equities may sometimes vary the share to be received by a party when a tenancy in common derived from a tenancy by the entirety is partitioned. [Citations omitted. Sebold, supra 143 U.S.App.D.C. at 415 n. 16, 444 F.2d at 873 n. 16.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hairston v. Hairston“. . . real property is purchased entirely by one spouse, and title is taken in the names of both as tenants by the entirety . the consideration to be implied for the share of the non-purchasing spouse is the faithful performance of . her marriage vows. [Sebold v. Sebold, D.C.Cir., 444 F.2d 864, 872 (1971).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. King“Since this is a question of law, ... the agreement of counsel is not binding on this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.