Garcia Ga v. Johanns’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 27 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Aliotta v. Bair (2010), Richards v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. (2006)
14 federal appellate · 27 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“can demonstrate to the court that the elements of a[n] [employer's] decisionmaking process are not capable of separation for analysis, the decisionmaking process may be analyzed as one employment practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“It does not suffice ... to show an ethnic imbalance in the USDA's award of loans to farmers; rather, the [plaintiffs] must show that a common facially neutral policy caused the imbalance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.