Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 FAPPX 256 - United States v. Springer

United States v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Oklahoma Northern District Court)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 6012 · 26 U.S.C. § 6091 · 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 26 U.S.C. § 63 · 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 26 U.S.C. § 7621

Relies on Faretta v. California · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · United States v. National Bank · United States Touhy v. Ragen · Lonsdale v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.