Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 1991
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Herko v. United States · Ortiz v. State · Drollinger v. State · Frith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In addition to demonstrating the existence of adverse publicity, it was incumbent upon the defendants to establish that the potential jurors were unable to set aside their preconceived notions of guilt and to render a verdict based upon the evidence. Sage v. State, (1981) [275] Ind. [699], 419 N.E.2d 1286, 1287 ; Drollinger v. State, (1980) [274] Ind. [5], 408 N.E.2d 1228, 1285 . Even if potential jurors had been exposed to pretrial publicity concerning the defendants' case that alone is insufficient to establish prejudice unless it is also demonstrated that the jurors were unable to set aside any preconceived notions they might have had. Pine v. State, (1980) [274] Ind. [78], 408 N.E.2d 1271 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.