Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 Pa. Super. 652 - Commonwealth v. Smith

444 Pa. Super. 652 - Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2016

17 state decisions

110199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Bordenkircher v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he guilty plea and the frequently concomitant plea bargain are valuable implements in our criminal justice system. The disposition of criminal charges by agreement between the prosecutor and the accused, ... is an essential component of the administration of justice. Properly administered, it is to be encouraged. In this Commonwealth, the practice of plea bargaining is generally regarded favorably, and is legitimized and governed by court rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]here is an affirmative duty on the part of the prosecutor to honor any and all promises made in exchange for a defendant’s plea. Our courts have demanded strict compliance with that duty in order to avoid any possible perversion of the plea bargaining system, evidencing the concern that a defendant might be coerced into a bargain or fraudulently induced to give up the very valued constitutional guarantees attendant the right to trial by jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Because this disposition may disturb the sentencing scheme of the court below, [Appellant's] judgment of sentence is vacated in its entirety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.