444 So. 2d 1005 - State v. Vanwinkle’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Harris · 437 So. 2d 166 - State v. Jacobs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, and (2) some of the underlying circumstances from which the officer concluded that the informant was credible or his information reliable. See also State v. Vanwinkle, 444 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 450 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1984). Under the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Enstice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.