444 So. 2d 1096 - Malczewski v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2015
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grant v. State · 143 So. 2d 817 - Goswick v. State · Huffman v. State · Huffman v. State · State v. . Sudderth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there need not be an actual touching of the victim's person in order for a battery to occur, but only a touching of something intimately connected with the victim's body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clark v. State“the word `person' in our state's battery statute ... means person or anything intimately connected with the person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clark v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.