Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 So. 2d 1102

Layton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 27, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-01-27

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 2001

4 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Brown v. State · Neuman v. Board of Adjustment

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-01-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Appellant has been given an opportunity to file a supplemental brief in proper person but has chosen not to respond. Accordingly, having reviewed both the Andersbrief filed by the public defender and the record on appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to the judgment and sentence. “However, because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court, that portion of the court’s order requiring the appellant to pay court costs and to make payments to the Victim’s Crime Compensation Fund is stricken.” Music v. State, 429 So.2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); see also Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

¶2Affirmed as modified.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN and RYDER, JJ., concur.
/444/so2d/1102 · .json · Public domain