¶1We have read the record and Mathis’ pro se brief in this case which is before us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and have found no reversible error.
¶2AFFIRMED.
444 So. 2d 1142
Mathis v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 8, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-08
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1985
3 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-02-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →