Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 So. 2d 1153

Doster v. Mims

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1990

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-02-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Bryon Curtis Doster appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The issue presented is whether a demand for the extradition of Doster was sufficient to support the rendition warrant issued by the Governor of Florida.

¶2The requisition demand from the state of Arizona stated: “it having been represented and satisfactorily shown to me that [Doster] was present in this State at the time of the commission of [the alleged offenses] and thereafter fled from the justice of this state.... ” There is no doubt that this request was sufficient to meet the requirements of law as provided for in section 941.03, Florida Statutes (1981). The argument offered by the public defender’s office in an Anders1 brief does not convince us otherwise.

¶3AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

¶4. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/444/so2d/1153 · .json · Public domain