¶1This case is before us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record and considering the issues raised in McCallum’s pro se brief, we find no reversible error.
¶2AFFIRMED.
444 So. 2d 1159
McCallum v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 13, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-13
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1985
5 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-02-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →