State v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably State v. Hudgins (1988), 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque (1993)
1 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Duncan · United States v. Darensbourg · 74 Wis. 2d 503 - Loveday v. State · 351 So. 2d 489 - State v. Rey · 403 So. 2d 683 - State v. Lehnen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, a distinction may be drawn between an unnamed denizen of the criminal underworld who habitually witnesses and reports criminal activity to police for pay or some other advantage and the citizen who witnesses or is the victim of criminal conduct and reports to police as a matter of civic duty. 1W. LaFave, Search and Seizure, A Treatise of the Fourth amendment, § 3.3 p. 499-500 (1978). When the informant is an anonymous person who routinely”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Probable cause exists when the facts and circumstances within the affiant's knowledge, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed and that evidence or contraband may be found at the place to be searched.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tilley“"Following the rule established in State v. Rey, supra, and expanded in State v. Lehnen, supra, we will rectify misstatements or omissions in the search warrant by correcting errors or supplying the missing information and then retest the affidavit for the presence of probable cause."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hodges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.