Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 SO2D 48 - Smart v. Marathon Seafood

Smart v. Marathon Seafood’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 902 · 33 U.S.C. § 903

Relies on Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. Caputo · Pfeiffer Company Inc v. Ford · Odom Construction Co. v. United States Department of Labor · Hullinghorst Industries, Inc. v. Carroll · Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In fact, section 440.09(2), Florida Statutes, expressly precludes receipt of Florida workers' compensation benefits when circumstances dictate that LHWCA benefits apply. This provision states: (2) Benefits are not payable in respect of the disability or death of any employee covered by the Federal Employer's Liability Act, the Longshoremen's and Harbor Worker's Compensation Act, or the Jones Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.