Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-02-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1999

1 state decisions

Relies on 412 So. 2d 935 - Parmenter v. State · 404 So. 2d 1140 - Deason v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

¶1We find that sufficient evidence was presented to justify revocation of appellant’s probation on the grounds that he failed to report to his probation officer, inform him of his correct address and whereabouts and attend a work program as he had agreed to do. However, we strike from the revocation order the finding that appellant violated condition two of his probation which required him to pay the cost of supervision since no evidence was presented showing that he had the ability to make such payments. See Cephas v. State, 412 So.2d 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Deason v. State, 404 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

¶2AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.