Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 So. 2d 87

Harnick v. Harnick

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 31, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-01-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1994

2 state decisions

Relies on In Re Estate of Carpenter · 212 So. 2d 74 - In Re Estate of Smith

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1A presumption of undue influence did not arise where the daughter, beneficiary of inter-vivos gifts and beneficiary under a will, although occupying a confidential relationship with the testator, was not shown to have actively procured the will or the gifts. See In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla.1971); In re Estate of Smith, 212 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

¶2Affirmed.

/444/so2d/87 · .json · Public domain