State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 1999
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · State v. Hayzlett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]t must be remembered that the safeguard against self-incrimination refers to evidence, ‘testimonial compulsion’; it does not mean that the accused may not be subjected to the observation of witnesses and jurors — in the absence of his being required to perforin some affirmative act in aid of observation."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Proctor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.