Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 SW2D 490 - State v. Morgan

State v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1995 · most notably United States v. Monaghan (1984), State v. Hutchinson (1970)

2 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

1401969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Snyder · State v. Reynolds · State v. Murray · State v. Varner · State v. Michael

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is no error in refusing to declare a mistrial for arguing that ‘the defense was free to offer any evidence that they had, and none was forthcoming,’ State v. Thomas, Mo.Sup., 393 S.W.2d 533, 538 [12]; State v. Hodge, Mo.Sup., 399 S.W.2d 65, 68 [5], or that ‘ “The State’s evidence stands uncontradicted in this case. When the State has concluded its case, the defense was free to offer any evidence it chose.’ ” State v. Siekermann, Mo.Sup., 367 S.W.2d 643, 651 [17]. And see five similar rulings cited and quoted from on pages 651 and 652. As stated in State v. Michael, Mo.Sup., 361 S.W.2d 664, 667 , the prohibition of § 546.270 RSMo 1959, and Criminal Rule 26.08 is against comment that the accused did not testify; not that the defendant did not offer any evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.