Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 S.W.2d 938

Galvin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1969-07-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1969

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-07-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

ONION, Judge.

¶2The offense is assault with intent to rob; the punishment, 3 years.

¶3Represented by retained counsel, appellant is presently at large, with the express approval of the trial court, on his original bond upon which retained counsel is one of the sureties.

¶4When sentence was pronounced and notice of appeal given, appellant’s retained counsel was present. On that same date appellant filed a pauper’s oath and motion which was limited to a request for the record on appeal. Such request was granted and the record has been forwarded to this court. There is nothing in the record to show that the appellant indicated to the court or other state officials that he was without funds to hire counsel on appeal. No motion for withdrawal by retained counsel appears in the record.

¶5No grounds of error are set forth in a brief filed in the trial court as required by Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

¶6We have examined the record and find nothing contained therein which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of said article.

¶7The judgment is affirmed.

/444/sw2d/938 · .json · Public domain