Ramirez-Memije v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Now, if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about the 22nd day of March, 2010, in Harris County, Texas, the defendant, Roman Ramirez-Memije, did then and there unlawfully, with the intent to harm or defraud another, possess at least ten but less than fifty items of identifying information, to wit: an electronic identification number of [list of twelve names], a living adult person, without said per son’s consent, then you will find the defendant guilty of fraudulent possession of identifying information, as charged in the indictment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Roman Ramirez-Memije v. State

2. “almost certainly reverse the conviction again”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Roman Ramirez-Memije v. State