Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 U.S. 223 - Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. Karlen

Strycker's Bay Neighborhood Council, Inc. v. Karlen’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

797
cited by 797 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

255 federal appellate · 165 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 797 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Owen v. City of Independence (1980), Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council (1989)

255 federal appellate · 165 district · 3 state decisions

455019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedKarlen v. Harris (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (§ 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Kleppe v. Sierra Club · Dove v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 797 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interject itself within the area of discretion of the executive as to the choice of the action to be taken.”
    53 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “study, develop, and describe appropriate alternatives to recommend courses of action in any proposal which involves unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Neither [NEPA] nor its legislative history contemplates that a court should substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the environmental consequences of its actions.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.