Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 444 U.S. 348 - Brown v. Glines

Brown v. Glines’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

605
cited by 605 later decisions
45
cited 45 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

228 federal appellate · 66 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 605 later decisions (45 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2020 · most notably Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York (1980), Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia (1980)

228 federal appellate · 66 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 11 states

310019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedGlines v. Wade (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Buckley v. Valeo · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. State of Alabama Patterson · Procunier v. Martinez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 605 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'different character of the military community and of the military mission ... [with its] overriding demands of discipline and duty.'”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must insist upon a respect for duty and a discipline without counterpart in civilian life.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Even when not confronted with the special requirements of the military, we have held that a government employer may subject its employees to such special restrictions on free expression as are reasonably necessary to promote effective government.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.