Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

444 U.S. 987

Apodaca v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1979

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1979-12-10

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Nottelson v. Smith Steel Workers D.A.L.U. 19806

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-12-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2010 · most notably Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. (1982), Strother v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group (1996)

68 federal appellate · 3 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 10 states

106019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from County Ct. at Law No. 2, El Paso County, Tex., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a properly presented federal question. Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
/444/us/987 · .json · Public domain