Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 A.2d 8 - State v. Forbes

State v. Forbes’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 469 So. 2d 1371 - Averette v. State (1985), 779 So. 2d 1225 - Ingram v. State (1999)

28 state decisions

1101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Castor v. United States · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · United States v. Robinson · 397 So. 2d 1308 - State v. Nicholas · State v. Hurd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`an undue tendency to move the tribunal to decide on an improper basis, commonly, though not always, an emotional one.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.