In Re Madera’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa · National Gypsum Company Insurance Company of North America v. Ngc Settlement Trust & Asbestos Claims Management Corporation · In re Italian Cook Oil Corp. · In the Matter Of: Sarma Gandy v. Sarma Gandy · Simpson v. MSA of Myrtle Beach, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 1325 does not suggest that the absence of an objection equals confirmation, but rather supports the principle of the need for judicial supervision of the plan confirmation process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Shelton“Debtors state they are current on their mortgages; therefore, these provisions [concerning mortgage arrearages] are inapplicable in the present case and completely superfluous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Parkman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.