In Re Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1115 (§ 321 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1126 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129
Relies on In Re Shat · In Re Gbadebo · In Re Roedemeier · In Re Tegeder · In Re Gelin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.