National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 357’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.2d 1015 · 1971
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently November 2003 · most notably Augspurger v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (1975), Royal Typewriter Company, a Division of Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Subsidiary of Litton Industries, Inc., and Litton Business Systems, Inc., a Subsidiary of Litton Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Local 469, Affiliated With International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Allied Industrial Workers of America, Local 469, Affiliated With International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Litton Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Local 469, Affiliated With International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (1976)
27 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vaca v. Sipes · Retail Store Employees Union Local 954, Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. Rothman · Local 282, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'n No. 13 v. National Labor Relations Board · Textile Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be afforded (1) an evidentiary hearing on any material issues of disputed fact presented by [the] objections . . . and (2) a presentation on the record of reasons for acceptance of the settlement agreement . . . notwithstanding [the] objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.