Adams v. Pate’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.2d 105 · 1971
Citation profile
79 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 231 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Johnson v. Glick (1973), Wolf-Lillie v. Sonquist (1983)
79 federal appellate · 8 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sostre v. McGinnis · Wright v. McMann · Schnell v. City of Chicago · Jordan v. Fitzharris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 231 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“this would appear to fairly and rationally satisfy the concept of procedural due process.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage““Where monetary damages, as distinguished from equitable relief, is sought under the provisions of the Civil Rights Act the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply; personal involvement of the defendant is required. [Citation omitted.]” (Emphasis added.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wood v. Breier · Maney v. Ratcliff“it is not accompanied by specific allegations, which, if proved, would establish ... cruel or unusual punishment within the purview ... of the Eighth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chavis v. Rowe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.