Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 F.2d 1233 - United States v. Morris

United States v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

445 F.2d 1233 · 1971

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably 173 W. Va. 290 - State v. Guthrie (1984), United States v. Bazinet (1972)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

19019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 472

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Jackson v. Denno · Gilbert v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The requirements of [Rule 5(a)] and the teachings of the Supreme Court in McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 , 63 S.Ct. 608 , 87 L.Ed. 819 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 , 77 S.Ct. 1356 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957) are designed to frustrate law-enforcing officers from detaining the arrested person for an unnecessary period of time to enable the officer to extract a confession from the arrested individual. But this salutary principle is not applicable where the person under arrest is in the custody and under the control of local and not federal officers, unless, of course, the state officers are acting at the direction of or in concert with the federal officers, or there is collaboration between the federal and state authorities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.