Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

445 F.2d 1399

Docket No. 25959.

Chan v. Rosenberg

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-08-06

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1977

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Asimakopoulos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · LEE

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1971-08-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gordon G. Dale (argued), of Gould & Dale, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioner.

L. Douglas Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Stuffin, INS, San Francisco, Cal., Jozseph Sureck, Director, INS, San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen., of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Petitioner seeks reversal of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings to enable her to apply for suspension of deportation under 8 U.S.C. 1254(a)(1). The Board ruled that petitioner, who had remained in the United States in a protected status, had not presented facts excepting her from the doctrine articulated in Matter of Lee (B.I.A. 11 I. & N. Dec. 649).

¶2

In Asimakopoulos v. I&NS (9th Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 1362 (No. 26,616, 1971), we overruled Matter of Lee because it conflicted with section 1254(a)(1).

¶3

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed in Asimakopoulos.

/445/f2d/1399 · .json · Public domain