Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 F.2d 166 - Allen M. Early and Jeannette B. Early v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Allen M. Early and Jeannette B. Early v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
February 1999
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 1999

7 federal appellate ·

80197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 102 · 26 U.S.C. § 273

Relies on Lyeth v. Hoey · Jones' Estate v. Commissioner · Commissioner v. Beck's Estate · Commissioner v. Siegel · Lockard v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “exclude the possibility that the exchange is in reality a compromise of an underlying and controverted claim”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “equally” under the law. 21 . See generally Lyeth v. Hoey, 305 U.S. 188 , 59 S.Ct. 155 , 83 L.Ed. 119 (1938)(holding that an heir who contested his grandmother's will and who, as a result of a compromise of that contest, received property from the grandmother’s estate which he would not have received had the will gone uncontested, acquired that property”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “acquired by gift, bequest, or inheritance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.