United States v. Couming’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.2d 555 · 1971
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably United States v. Koliboski (1984), United States v. Aitken (1985)
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on Morissette v. United States · Screws v. United States · James v. United States · Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Wingate Corp. · Gutknecht v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it was shown that [the defendant] knew the requirements of the law and deliberately refrained from complying, then he had the 'bad purpose' of specifically intending to violate the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.