Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 F.3d 1 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

445 F.3d 1 · 2006

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2023
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 15 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023 · most notably Rita v. United States (2007), United States v. Martin (2008)

52 federal appellate · 15 district ·

610200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Kashif v. United States · United States v. Moreland · United States v. Dean · United States v. Jiménez-Beltre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he farther the judge's sentence departs from the guidelines sentence . . . the more compelling the justification based on factors in [the statute] that the judge must offer in order to enable the court of appeals to assess the reasonableness of the sentence imposed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “history and characteristics of the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reliance on a discounted or excluded factor may, like the extent of the variance, have some bearing on reasonableness.” United States v. Smith, 445 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006). See also United States v. Davis, 458 F.3d 491, 498 (6th Cir.2006) (district court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.