Grubbs v. Bailes’s Empirical Analysis
445 F.3d 1275 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Village of Willowbrook v. Olech · Franchise Tax Board of California v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd. · Pierce v. Gilchrist · Taylor v. Meacham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where information has been omitted from an affidavit, we determine the existence of probable cause by examining the affidavit as if the omitted information had been included and inquiring if the affidavit would still have given rise to probable cause for the warrant. If hypothetically correcting the misrepresentation or omission would not alter the determination of probable cause, the misconduct was not of constitutional significance and is not actionable under § 1983; but if this hypothesizing would alter the probable-cause determination, the misconduct undermined Fourth Amendment guarantees and may support redress under § 1983.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Joseph v. Shepherd“As a general matter, shareholders suffer injury in the Article III sense when the corporation incurs significant harm, reducing the return on their investment and lowering the value of their stockholdings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bixler v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.