Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 445 F.3d 1282 - Coloma v. Holder

Coloma v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

445 F.3d 1282 · 2006

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Witte v. United States · Ruggiano v. Reish · Larry Romine v. Frederick J. Head · United States v. Flores · Kaufmann v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hatever else the word [concurrent] means with regard to the second sentence, ... it does not mean that the two sentences 'hav[e] the same starting date because a federal sentence cannot commence prior to the date it is pronounced, even if made concurrent with a sentence already being served.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “which says that service of the sentence commences when the defendant arrives in prison.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.